Phase Field Models Versus Parametric Front Tracking Methods: Are They Accurate and Computationally Efficient?

Authors

  • John W. Barrett, Harald Garcke & Robert Nürnberg

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4208/cicp.190313.010813a

Abstract

We critically compare the practicality and accuracy of numerical approximations of phase field models and sharp interface models of solidification. Here we focus on Stefan problems, and their quasi-static variants, with applications to crystal growth. New approaches with a high mesh quality for the parametric approximations of the resulting free boundary problems and new stable discretizations of the anisotropic phase field system are taken into account in a comparison involving benchmark problems based on exact solutions of the free boundary problem.

Published

2018-03-27

Abstract View

  • 40136

Pdf View

  • 4030

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Phase Field Models Versus Parametric Front Tracking Methods: Are They Accurate and Computationally Efficient?. (2018). Communications in Computational Physics, 15(2), 506-555. https://doi.org/10.4208/cicp.190313.010813a