A Comparison Study of Numerical Methods for Compressible Two-Phase Flows

A Comparison Study of Numerical Methods for Compressible Two-Phase Flows

Year:    2017

Author:    Jianyu Lin, Hang Ding, Xiyun Lu, Peng Wang

Advances in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, Vol. 9 (2017), Iss. 5 : pp. 1111–1132

Abstract

In this article a comparison study of the numerical methods for compressible two-phase flows is presented. Although many numerical methods have been developed in recent years to deal with the jump conditions at the fluid-fluid interfaces in compressible multiphase flows, there is a lack of a detailed comparison of these methods. With this regard, the transport five equation model, the modified ghost fluid method and the cut-cell method are investigated here as the typical methods in this field. A variety of numerical experiments are conducted to examine their performance in simulating inviscid compressible two-phase flows. Numerical experiments include Richtmyer-Meshkov instability, interaction between a shock and a rectangle $SF_6$ bubble, Rayleigh collapse of a cylindrical gas bubble in water and shock-induced bubble collapse, involving fluids with small or large density difference. Based on the numerical results, the performance of the method is assessed by the convergence order of the method with respect to interface position, mass conservation, interface resolution and computational efficiency.

You do not have full access to this article.

Already a Subscriber? Sign in as an individual or via your institution

Journal Article Details

Publisher Name:    Global Science Press

Language:    English

DOI:    https://doi.org/10.4208/aamm.OA-2016-0084

Advances in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, Vol. 9 (2017), Iss. 5 : pp. 1111–1132

Published online:    2017-01

AMS Subject Headings:    Global Science Press

Copyright:    COPYRIGHT: © Global Science Press

Pages:    22

Keywords:    Diffuse interface method modified ghost fluid method cut-cell method compressible flow two-phase flow.

Author Details

Jianyu Lin

Hang Ding

Xiyun Lu

Peng Wang

  1. A Conservative Sharp-Interface Numerical Method for Two-dimensional Compressible Two-phase Flows

    Bai, Xiao | Li, Maojun

    Journal of Scientific Computing, Vol. 97 (2023), Iss. 2

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-023-02338-8 [Citations: 0]
  2. Computational Fluid Dynamics

    A Simplified Lattice Boltzmann Flux Solver of Multiphase Flows

    Hou, Guoxiang | Chen, Caikan | Qin, Shenglei | Gao, Yuan | Wang, Kai

    2024

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0349-4_13 [Citations: 0]
  3. A mass-conserved fractional step axisymmetric lattice Boltzmann flux solver for incompressible multiphase flows with large density ratio

    Yang, Liuming | Shu, Chang | Yu, Yang | Wang, Yan | Hou, Guoxiang

    Physics of Fluids, Vol. 32 (2020), Iss. 10

    https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0022050 [Citations: 20]
  4. Numerical modeling of multiphase compressible flows with the presence of shock waves using an interface-sharpening five-equation model

    Nguyen, Van-Tu | Phan, Thanh-Hoang | Park, Warn-Gyu

    International Journal of Multiphase Flow, Vol. 135 (2021), Iss. P.103542

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2020.103542 [Citations: 10]
  5. A simplified lattice Boltzmann flux solver for multiphase flows with large density ratio

    Yang, Liuming | Shu, Chang | Chen, Zhen | Wang, Yan | Hou, Guoxiang

    International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, Vol. 93 (2021), Iss. 6 P.1895

    https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.4958 [Citations: 11]
  6. Investigation of shock and a dust cloud interaction in Eulerian framework using a newly developed OpenFOAM solver

    Ejtehadi, Omid | Mahravan, Ehsan | Sohn, Ilyoup

    International Journal of Multiphase Flow, Vol. 145 (2021), Iss. P.103812

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2021.103812 [Citations: 7]