Capturing Near-Equilibrium Solutions: A Comparison Between High-Order Discontinuous Galerkin Methods and Well-Balanced Schemes
Year: 2019
Communications in Computational Physics, Vol. 26 (2019), Iss. 1 : pp. 1–34
Abstract
Equilibrium or stationary solutions usually proceed through the exact balance between hyperbolic transport terms and source terms. Such equilibrium solutions are affected by truncation errors that prevent any classical numerical scheme from capturing the evolution of small amplitude waves of physical significance. In order to overcome this problem, we compare two commonly adopted strategies: going to very high order and reduce drastically the truncation errors on the equilibrium solution, or design a specific scheme that preserves by construction the equilibrium exactly, the so-called well-balanced approach. We present a modern numerical implementation of these two strategies and compare them in details, using hydrostatic but also dynamical equilibrium solutions of several simple test cases. Finally, we apply our methodology to the simulation of a protoplanetary disc in centrifugal equilibrium around its star and model its interaction with an embedded planet, illustrating in a realistic application the strength of both methods.
You do not have full access to this article.
Already a Subscriber? Sign in as an individual or via your institution
Journal Article Details
Publisher Name: Global Science Press
Language: English
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4208/cicp.OA-2018-0071
Communications in Computational Physics, Vol. 26 (2019), Iss. 1 : pp. 1–34
Published online: 2019-01
AMS Subject Headings: Global Science Press
Copyright: COPYRIGHT: © Global Science Press
Pages: 34
Keywords: Numerical methods benchmark well-balanced methods discontinuous Galerkin methods.
-
On high order positivity-preserving well-balanced finite volume methods for the Euler equations with gravitation
Ren, Yupeng | Wu, Kailiang | Qiu, Jianxian | Xing, YulongJournal of Computational Physics, Vol. 492 (2023), Iss. P.112429
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2023.112429 [Citations: 1] -
Well-balanced methods for computational astrophysics
Käppeli, Roger
Living Reviews in Computational Astrophysics, Vol. 8 (2022), Iss. 1
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41115-022-00014-6 [Citations: 5] -
Positivity-preserving well-balanced central discontinuous Galerkin schemes for the Euler equations under gravitational fields
Jiang, Haili | Tang, Huazhong | Wu, KailiangJournal of Computational Physics, Vol. 463 (2022), Iss. P.111297
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111297 [Citations: 4] -
Toward fully compressible numerical simulations of stellar magneto-convection with the RAMSES code
Canivete Cuissa, J. R. | Teyssier, R.Astronomy & Astrophysics, Vol. 664 (2022), Iss. P.A24
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202142754 [Citations: 4] -
Efficient Iterative Arbitrary High-Order Methods: an Adaptive Bridge Between Low and High Order
Micalizzi, Lorenzo | Torlo, Davide | Boscheri, WalterCommunications on Applied Mathematics and Computation, Vol. (2023), Iss.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42967-023-00290-w [Citations: 3] -
Energy conserving and well-balanced discontinuous Galerkin methods for the Euler–Poisson equations in spherical symmetry
Zhang, Weijie | Xing, Yulong | Endeve, EirikMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 514 (2022), Iss. 1 P.370
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac1257 [Citations: 2] -
Novel Well-Balanced Continuous Interior Penalty Stabilizations
Micalizzi, Lorenzo | Ricchiuto, Mario | Abgrall, RémiJournal of Scientific Computing, Vol. 100 (2024), Iss. 1
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-024-02563-9 [Citations: 1] -
Uniformly High-Order Structure-Preserving Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for Euler Equations with Gravitation: Positivity and Well-Balancedness
Wu, Kailiang | Xing, YulongSIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, Vol. 43 (2021), Iss. 1 P.A472
https://doi.org/10.1137/20M133782X [Citations: 16] -
Well-balanced treatment of gravity in astrophysical fluid dynamics simulations at low Mach numbers
Edelmann, P. V. F. | Horst, L. | Berberich, J. P. | Andrassy, R. | Higl, J. | Leidi, G. | Klingenberg, C. | Röpke, F. K.Astronomy & Astrophysics, Vol. 652 (2021), Iss. P.A53
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202140653 [Citations: 13]