Close Search Advanced
Journals
Resources
About Us
Open Access

Comparative Study of Three High Order Schemes for LES of Temporally Evolving Mixing Layers

Comparative Study of Three High Order Schemes for LES of Temporally Evolving Mixing Layers
Preview
Add to basket

Year:    2012

Communications in Computational Physics, Vol. 12 (2012), Iss. 5 : pp. 1603–1622

Abstract

Three high order shock-capturing schemes are compared for large eddy simulations (LES) of temporally evolving mixing layers for different convective Mach numbers ranging from the quasi-incompressible regime to highly compressible supersonic regime. The considered high order schemes are fifth-order WENO (WENO5), seventh-order WENO (WENO7) and the associated eighth-order central spatial base scheme with the dissipative portion of WENO7 as a nonlinear post-processing filter step (WENO7fi). This high order nonlinear filter method of Yee & Sjogreen is designed for accurate and efficient simulations of shock-free compressible turbulence, turbulence with shocklets and turbulence with strong shocks with minimum tuning of scheme parameters. The LES results by WENO7fi using the same scheme parameter agree well with experimental results compiled by Barone et al., and published direct numerical simulations (DNS) work of Rogers & Moser and Pantano & Sarkar, whereas results by WENO5 and WENO7 compare poorly with experimental data and DNS computations.

Submit Article

You do not have full access to this article.

Already a Subscriber? Sign in as an individual or via your institution

Journal Article Details

Publisher Name:    Global Science Press

Language:    English

DOI:    https://doi.org/10.4208/cicp.261111.130412a

Communications in Computational Physics, Vol. 12 (2012), Iss. 5 : pp. 1603–1622

Published online:    2012-01

AMS Subject Headings:    Global Science Press

Copyright:    COPYRIGHT: © Global Science Press

Pages:    20

Keywords:   

  1. High Order Numerical Methods for the Dynamic SGS Model of Turbulent Flows with Shocks

    Kotov, D. V. | Yee, H. C. | Wray, A. A. | Hadjadj, A. | Sjögreen, B.

    Communications in Computational Physics, Vol. 19 (2016), Iss. 2 P.273

    https://doi.org/10.4208/cicp.211014.040915a [Citations: 21]

  2. Compact ETDRK scheme for nonlinear dispersive wave equations

    Ahmat, Muyassar | Qiu, Jianxian

    Computational and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 40 (2021), Iss. 8

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-021-01687-0 [Citations: 2]

  3. On the robustness and accuracy of large-eddy simulation in predicting complex internal flow of a gas-turbine combustor

    Qiao, Zheng | Chen, Yu | Wan, Kaidi | Lv, Yu

    Physics of Fluids, Vol. 35 (2023), Iss. 8

    https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0159887 [Citations: 0]

  4. Numerical dissipation control in high order shock-capturing schemes for LES of low speed flows

    Kotov, D.V. | Yee, H.C. | Wray, A.A. | Sjögreen, B. | Kritsuk, A.G.

    Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 307 (2016), Iss. P.189

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2015.11.029 [Citations: 33]

  5. Computational challenges for simulations related to the NASA electric arc shock tube (EAST) experiments

    Kotov, Dmitry V. | Yee, H.C. | Panesi, Marco | Prabhu, Dinesh K. | Wray, Alan A.

    Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 269 (2014), Iss. P.215

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2014.03.021 [Citations: 38]

  6. OpenSBLI v3.0: High-fidelity multi-block transonic aerofoil CFD simulations using domain specific languages on GPUs

    Lusher, David J. | Sansica, Andrea | Sandham, Neil D. | Meng, Jianping | Siklósi, Bálint | Hashimoto, Atsushi

    Computer Physics Communications, Vol. 307 (2025), Iss. P.109406

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2024.109406 [Citations: 0]

  7. An a posteriori-implicit turbulent model with automatic dissipation adjustment for Large Eddy Simulation of compressible flows

    Nogueira, Xesús | Ramírez, Luis | Fernández-Fidalgo, Javier | Deligant, Michael | Khelladi, Sofiane | Chassaing, Jean-Camille | Navarrina, Fermín

    Computers & Fluids, Vol. 197 (2020), Iss. P.104371

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2019.104371 [Citations: 7]

  8. Numerical investigation on chaos in late boundary layer transition to turbulence

    Lu, Ping | Thapa, Manoj | Liu, Chaoqun

    Computers & Fluids, Vol. 91 (2014), Iss. P.68

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2013.11.027 [Citations: 3]

  9. High Order Numerical Methods for the Dynamic SGS Model of Turbulent Flows with Shocks

    Kotov, Dmitry V. | Yee, Helen | Wray, Alan | Sjogreen, Bjorn

    22nd AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, (2015),

    https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2015-2297 [Citations: 0]
  10. Spectral and High Order Methods for Partial Differential Equations ICOSAHOM 2014

    Numerical Dissipation Control in High Order Shock-Capturing Schemes for LES of Low Speed Flows

    Kotov, D. V. | Yee, H. C. | Wray, A. A. | Sjögreen, B.

    2015

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19800-2_25 [Citations: 2]