Close Search Advanced
Journals
Resources
About Us
Open Access

Test-Particle Simulation of Space Plasmas

Test-Particle Simulation of Space Plasmas
Preview
Add to basket

Year:    2010

Communications in Computational Physics, Vol. 8 (2010), Iss. 3 : pp. 471–483

Abstract

Test-particle simulations provide a useful complement to the kinetic simulations of many-body systems and their approximate treatment with multiple moments. In a kinetic approach, systems are described at a microscopic level in terms of a large number of degrees of freedom. Fluid or multiple moment approaches, however, provide a description at the macroscopic level, in terms of relatively few physical parameters involving averages or moments of particle distribution functions. Ideally, fully kinetic descriptions should be done whenever possible. Due to their complexity, the use of these approaches is often not practical in many cases of interest. In comparison, the fluid approximation is much simpler to implement and solve. It can be used to describe complex phenomena in multi-dimensional geometry with realistic boundary conditions. Its main drawback is its inability to account for many phenomena taking place on fine space or time scales, or phenomena involving nonlocal transport. Macroscopic approaches are also not adapted to describe large deviations from local equilibrium, such as the occurrence of particle beams or otherwise strong anisotropy. With the test-particle method, particle trajectories are calculated using approximated fields obtained from a low level approach, such as multiple moments. Approximate fields can also be obtained from experiments or observations. Assuming that these fields are representative of actual systems, various kinetic and statistical properties of the system can then be calculated, such as particle distribution functions and moments thereof. In this paper, the test-particle method is discussed in the context of classical statistical physics of many-body interacting point particles. Four different formulations of the method are presented, which correspond to four broad categories of the application encountered in the field of plasma physics and astronomy.

Submit Article

You do not have full access to this article.

Already a Subscriber? Sign in as an individual or via your institution

Journal Article Details

Publisher Name:    Global Science Press

Language:    English

DOI:    https://doi.org/10.4208/cicp.201009.280110a

Communications in Computational Physics, Vol. 8 (2010), Iss. 3 : pp. 471–483

Published online:    2010-01

AMS Subject Headings:    Global Science Press

Copyright:    COPYRIGHT: © Global Science Press

Pages:    13

Keywords:   

  1. Electron trapping in the coma of a weakly outgassing comet

    Sishtla, Chaitanya Prasad | Divin, Andrey | Deca, Jan | Olshevsky, Vyacheslav | Markidis, Stefano

    Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 26 (2019), Iss. 10

    https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5115456 [Citations: 8]

  2. On the Origin of Donut‐Shaped Electron Distributions Within Magnetic Cavities

    Li, Jing‐Huan | Zhou, Xu‐Zhi | Zong, Qiu‐Gang | Yang, Fan | Fu, Suiyan | Yao, Shutao | Liu, Ji | Shi, Quanqi

    Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 48 (2021), Iss. 2

    https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL091613 [Citations: 11]

  3. Aberrations in Particle Distribution Functions Near e-POP Particle Sensors

    Marchand, Richard | Hussain, Sajjad

    IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, Vol. 43 (2015), Iss. 9 P.2776

    https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2015.2428715 [Citations: 3]

  4. Test Particle Simulation of Solar Wind Transport into the Magnetosphere during Northward IMF

    ZHAO, Mingxian

    Chinese Journal of Space Science, Vol. 42 (2022), Iss. 6 P.1068

    https://doi.org/10.11728/cjss2022.06.210721078 [Citations: 0]

  5. Modelling Electrostatic Sheath Effects on Swarm Electric Field Instrument Measurements

    Marchand, R. | Burchill, J. K. | Knudsen, D. J.

    Space Science Reviews, Vol. 156 (2010), Iss. 1-4 P.73

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-010-9735-y [Citations: 18]

  6. Emergence of the active magnetotail plasma sheet boundary from transient, localized ion acceleration

    Zhou, X.‐Z. | Angelopoulos, V. | Runov, A. | Liu, J. | Ge, Y. S.

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Vol. 117 (2012), Iss. A10

    https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JA018171 [Citations: 41]

  7. Finite-length effects on cylindrical Langmuir probes

    Marholm, Sigvald | Marchand, Richard

    Physical Review Research, Vol. 2 (2020), Iss. 2

    https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.023016 [Citations: 16]

  8. Characteristics of high‐latitude precursor flows ahead of dipolarization fronts

    Li, Jia‐Zheng | Zhou, Xu‐Zhi | Runov, Andrei | Angelopoulos, Vassilis | Liu, Jiang | Pan, Dong‐Xiao | Zong, Qiu‐Gang

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Vol. 122 (2017), Iss. 5 P.5307

    https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA023902 [Citations: 5]

  9. Limitations of stationary Vlasov-Poisson solvers in probe theory

    Chiabó, L. | Sánchez-Arriaga, G.

    Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 438 (2021), Iss. P.110366

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110366 [Citations: 2]

  10. Understanding the ion distributions near the boundaries of reconnection outflow region

    Zhou, Xu‐Zhi | Pan, Dong‐Xiao | Angelopoulos, Vassilis | Runov, Andrei | Zong, Qiu‐Gang | Pu, Zu‐Yin

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Vol. 121 (2016), Iss. 10 P.9400

    https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA022993 [Citations: 5]

  11. Numerical Study of Plasma Depletion Region in a Satellite Wake

    Usui, Hideyuki | Miyake, Yohei | Miloch, Wojciech J. | Ito, Keisuke

    IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, Vol. 47 (2019), Iss. 8 P.3717

    https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2019.2918789 [Citations: 6]

  12. Data-optimized source modeling with the Backwards Liouville Test–Kinetic method

    Woodroffe, J.R. | Brito, T.V. | Jordanova, V.K. | Henderson, M.G. | Morley, S.K. | Denton, M.H.

    Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Vol. 177 (2018), Iss. P.125

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2017.09.010 [Citations: 3]

  13. Impact of plasma sheath on rocket-based E-region ion measurements

    Imtiaz, Nadia | Burchill, Johnathan | Marchand, Richard

    Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol. 355 (2015), Iss. 1 P.23

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-014-2150-1 [Citations: 2]

  14. Sheath effects on DEMETER ion drift measurements

    Marchand, Richard | Knutson, Nelson | Berthelier, Jean-Jacques

    Planetary and Space Science, Vol. 58 (2010), Iss. 10 P.1365

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2010.05.021 [Citations: 3]

  15. Kinetic analysis of the plasma sheath around an electron-emitting object with elliptic cross section

    Chiabó, Luca | Shahsavani, Sadaf | Sánchez-Arriaga, Gonzalo

    Physical Review E, Vol. 104 (2021), Iss. 5

    https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.104.055204 [Citations: 1]

  16. Kinetic modeling of Langmuir probe characteristics in a laboratory plasma near a conducting body

    Rehman, Saeed ur | Fisher, Lisa E. | Lynch, Kristina A. | Marchand, Richard

    Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 24 (2017), Iss. 1

    https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4972879 [Citations: 2]

  17. Earth magnetic field effects on Swarm electric field instrument

    Rehman, S. | Burchill, J. | Eriksson, A. | Marchand, R.

    Planetary and Space Science, Vol. 73 (2012), Iss. 1 P.145

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2012.10.004 [Citations: 7]

  18. Comparison of different interpolation operators including nonlinear subdivision schemes in the simulation of particle trajectories

    Bensiali, Bouchra | Bodi, Kowsik | Ciraolo, Guido | Ghendrih, Philippe | Liandrat, Jacques

    Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 236 (2013), Iss. P.346

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2012.11.025 [Citations: 1]

  19. The effects of lunar surface plasma absorption and solar wind temperature anisotropies on the solar wind proton velocity space distributions in the low‐altitude lunar plasma wake

    Fatemi, S. | Holmström, M. | Futaana, Y.

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Vol. 117 (2012), Iss. A10

    https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA017353 [Citations: 21]

  20. Evaluating the Adiabatic Invariants in Magnetized Plasmas Using a Classical Ehrenfest Theorem

    Tamburrini, Abiam | Davis, Sergio | Moya, Pablo S.

    Entropy, Vol. 25 (2023), Iss. 11 P.1559

    https://doi.org/10.3390/e25111559 [Citations: 0]

  21. Kinetic Simulation of Spacecraft–Environment Interaction

    Marchand, Richard | Resendiz Lira, Pedro Alberto

    IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, Vol. 45 (2017), Iss. 4 P.535

    https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2017.2682229 [Citations: 30]

  22. Dust mobilization in the presence of magnetic fields

    Yeo, Li Hsia | Hood, Noah | Wang, Xu | Horányi, Mihály

    Physical Review E, Vol. 106 (2022), Iss. 1

    https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.106.L013203 [Citations: 3]

  23. Access of energetic particles to Titan׳s exobase: A study of Cassini׳s T9 flyby

    Regoli, L.H. | Roussos, E. | Feyerabend, M. | Jones, G.H. | Krupp, N. | Coates, A.J. | Simon, S. | Motschmann, U. | Dougherty, M.K.

    Planetary and Space Science, Vol. 130 (2016), Iss. P.40

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2015.11.013 [Citations: 21]

  24. Ion Heating with Beating Electrostatic Waves

    Jorns, B. | Choueiri, E. Y.

    Physical Review Letters, Vol. 106 (2011), Iss. 8

    https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.085002 [Citations: 12]

  25. Comparative study of forward and backward test-kinetic simulation approaches

    Voitcu, Gabriel | Echim, Marius | Marchand, Richard

    Computer Physics Communications, Vol. 183 (2012), Iss. 12 P.2561

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2012.07.005 [Citations: 6]

  26. A New Technique to Infer Plasma Density, Flow Velocity, and Satellite Potential From Ion Currents Collected by a Segmented Langmuir Probe

    Olowookere, Akinola | Marchand, Richard

    IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, Vol. 50 (2022), Iss. 10 P.3774

    https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2022.3205868 [Citations: 1]

  27. PTetra, a Tool to Simulate Low Orbit Satellite–Plasma Interaction

    Marchand, Richard

    IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, Vol. 40 (2012), Iss. 2 P.217

    https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2011.2172638 [Citations: 62]

  28. Ionospheric Langmuir Probe Electron Temperature Asymmetry and Magnetic Field Connectivity

    Marchand, Richard

    IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, Vol. 45 (2017), Iss. 8 P.1923

    https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2016.2619668 [Citations: 5]

  29. Ring-shaped velocity distribution functions in energy-dispersed structures formed at the boundaries of a proton stream injected into a transverse magnetic field: Test-kinetic results

    Voitcu, Gabriel | Echim, Marius M.

    Physics of Plasmas, Vol. 19 (2012), Iss. 2

    https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3686134 [Citations: 7]

  30. Azimuthal ion movement in HiPIMS plasmas—part I: velocity distribution function

    Thiemann-Monjé, S | Held, J | Schüttler, S | von Keudell, A | Schulz-von der Gathen, V

    Plasma Sources Science and Technology, Vol. 32 (2023), Iss. 10 P.105007

    https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6595/acfe95 [Citations: 2]

  31. Earth Magnetic Field Effects on Particle Sensors on LEO Satellites

    Rehman, Saeed Ur | Marchand, Richard | Berthelier, Jean-Jacques | Onishi, Tatsuo | Burchill, Johnathan

    IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, Vol. 41 (2013), Iss. 12 P.3402

    https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2013.2262715 [Citations: 8]

  32. Test particle acceleration in resistive torsional fan magnetic reconnection using laboratory plasma parameters

    Chesny, D.L. | Orange, N.B. | Hatfield, K.W.

    Journal of Plasma Physics, Vol. 87 (2021), Iss. 6

    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022377821001203 [Citations: 3]

  33. On the Origin of Perpendicular Ion Anisotropy Inside Dipolarizing Flux Bundles

    Zhou, Xu‐Zhi | Xu, Yan | Runov, Andrei | Liu, Jiang | Artemyev, Anton V. | Angelopoulos, Vassilis | Birn, Joachim | Yao, Zhonghua | Pan, Dong‐Xiao | Zong, Qiu‐Gang

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Vol. 124 (2019), Iss. 6 P.4009

    https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA026519 [Citations: 4]