Year: 2007
Author: Mark Ainsworth
International Journal of Numerical Analysis and Modeling, Vol. 4 (2007), Iss. 1 : pp. 141–142
Abstract
An invalid assumption on the equivalence of alternative sets of degrees of freedom for the rotated $\mathbb{Q}_1$ element led to an incompatibility between the analysis and the application in our earlier article [1]. We outline minor modifications needed to restore the validity of all results and conclusions in the previous article.
You do not have full access to this article.
Already a Subscriber? Sign in as an individual or via your institution
Journal Article Details
Publisher Name: Global Science Press
Language: English
DOI: https://doi.org/2007-IJNAM-856
International Journal of Numerical Analysis and Modeling, Vol. 4 (2007), Iss. 1 : pp. 141–142
Published online: 2007-01
AMS Subject Headings: Global Science Press
Copyright: COPYRIGHT: © Global Science Press
Pages: 2