Year: 2008
Author: Lijing Wang
Journal of Fiber Bioengineering and Informatics, Vol. 1 (2008), Iss. 4 : pp. 307–320
Abstract
Today there are varieties of comments prevailing among people who use Plastic and Paper bags for their shopping needs. A few people support Plastic bags with their own justifications and others support Paper bags. This is a hot topic of today and arguments are going up and down to deduce which one is better in terms of environmental impact, but some people abstain from this issue by choosing the other option of going with reusable bags. This exploratory study is attempted to infer the environmental concerns made by these bags. The two common grocery bags of today - Paper & Plastic bags are compared in this study. Two imperative measures - total amount of energy used by a bag to get it manufactured and the amount of pollutants emitted during the manufacturing phase of a bag - are chosen as data for Life Cycle Inventory (LCI). To arrive at a clear state of conclusion with respect to environmental impact made by these two bags, life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) study was accomplished. Evolvement of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) study from the data available on this context is the crux of this study. The Eco-indicator 99, damage oriented method for LCIA in SIMAPRO 7.1 tool is used to assess the environmental impact made by these two grocery bags. The single score values calculated by the Eco-indicator 99 is considered as a directive to compare the environmental impact made by these and a detailed explanation of results is also dealt with in this paper. As far as the Life cycle energy analysis and amount of pollutants produced from these two bags are concerned, a plastic bag simply scores out a paper bag. The impact assessment results are also in line to support the plastic bags over paper bags. However, this conclusion has been drawn on the basis of the secondary data chosen for LCI and the results provided by the software which also has certain hypotheses and assumptions.
You do not have full access to this article.
Already a Subscriber? Sign in as an individual or via your institution
Journal Article Details
Publisher Name: Global Science Press
Language: English
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3993/jfbi03200909
Journal of Fiber Bioengineering and Informatics, Vol. 1 (2008), Iss. 4 : pp. 307–320
Published online: 2008-01
AMS Subject Headings:
Copyright: COPYRIGHT: © Global Science Press
Pages: 14
Keywords: plastic bags
Author Details
-
Materials and manufacturing environmental sustainability evaluation of apparel product: knitted T-shirt case study
Khan, Md Mashiur Rahman | Islam, Md MazedulTextiles and Clothing Sustainability, Vol. 1 (2015), Iss. 1
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40689-015-0008-8 [Citations: 35] -
Quantification of environmental impact and ecological sustainability for textile fibres
Muthu, Subramanian Senthilkannan | Li, Y. | Hu, J.Y. | Mok, P.Y.Ecological Indicators, Vol. 13 (2012), Iss. 1 P.66
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.05.008 [Citations: 80] -
Carbon footprint of shopping (grocery) bags in China, Hong Kong and India
Muthu, Subramanian Senthilkannan | Li, Y. | Hu, J.Y. | Mok, P.Y.Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 45 (2011), Iss. 2 P.469
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.09.054 [Citations: 71] -
Challenges and risks when communicating comparative LCA results to management
Prado, Valentina | Seager, Thomas P. | Guglielmi, GiovanniThe International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 27 (2022), Iss. 9-11 P.1164
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-022-02090-5 [Citations: 8] -
Exploratory Study of Textile Undergraduates’ Knowledge and Perception towards Eco-Friendly Clothing in Bangladesh
Haq, Upama Nasrin | Akhter Ite, TaniaTekstilec, Vol. 65 (2022), Iss. 1 P.44
https://doi.org/10.14502/tekstilec.65.2021036 [Citations: 1] -
Environmental Footprints of Packaging
Potentials of Fibrous and Nonfibrous Materials in Biodegradable Packaging
Samanta, Kartick K. | Basak, S. | Chattopadhyay, S. K.2016
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-913-4_4 [Citations: 9] -
Environmental Implications of Recycling and Recycled Products
Recycled Fibrous and Nonfibrous Biomass for Value-Added Textile and Nontextile Applications
Samanta, Kartick K. | Basak, S. | Chattopadhyay, S. K.2015
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-643-0_8 [Citations: 8] -
Environmental Footprints of Packaging
Environmental Impacts of Packaging Materials
Sharma, Aashish | Nautiyal, Himanshu2016
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-913-4_5 [Citations: 6] -
Eco-Impact of Plastic and Paper Shopping Bags
Muthu, Subramanian Senthilkannan | Li, Yi | Hu, J.Y. | Mok, P.Y. | Ding, XuemeiJournal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics, Vol. 7 (2012), Iss. 1
https://doi.org/10.1177/155892501200700103 [Citations: 15]